Mission as Building Character

In his ongoing articulation of the meaning of Mission, Steve Simmer sends us this.

Many years ago, a long-time AA member I knew introduced me to the Shit Fairy. The Shit Fairy is the little voice on my shoulder that fills my ear with shit–bullshit, horseshit, and chicken shit. If I listen to this long enough, it turns my life into shit. What I say is bullshit, what I do is horseshit, and I am a chicken shit–a coward to the bone. Everyone who knows me, knows about the piles of shit in my life. They tiptoe around them and don’t say anything, but they know they are there. I’m not going to live a shit-free life. But what I can do is turn this into fertilizer.

I have been mission coordinator in New England for over a year, and encouraging mission is central to my own mission. What this says about me–my truth–is that at bottom I am a very selfish man. It’s all about me. I don’t give easily. I don’t give to charity, I walk by the homeless people on the street muttering a story to myself about how they are lazy addicts, and I don’t give my time away easily, even to my own kids. (That one hurts to admit). I am always keeping track of favors I give, waiting impatiently for others to pay them back. I am staunchly selfish, and I justify the selfishness easily through years of practice: I’ll do it later, I’ll give at the office, I’m already doing plenty, I can’t afford it, I’m too busy, etc. If I ever do give anything away, I expect a Nobel prize. I have shame when I speak this truth to you, that I’m basically focused just on me, and that I give up my life energy only when they pry it from my dead cold hands.

When I say my mission, I am lying. I believe that is true for every man. “I create a world of peace through giving.” Yeah, right. “I create a world of love by loving others and myself.” Yeah, sure you do. You can’t bullshit a bullshitter.

When I say my mission, I am also defining my life work. C. G. Jung, in talking about the work of psychotherapy, borrowed the alchemical phrase the opus contra naturam, the “work against nature.” My work in life is working against the given of who I am, working against my personality. I also believe that is true of every man. I believe that a central purpose of the Mankind Project is working against personality in order to develop character.

Personality is different from character. A man’s personality is his primary emotional programming, his temperament. It is “what comes naturally” to a person. It determines whether he tends to react to life with a pleasant smile, a sense of foreboding, a fatalistic shrug, or a defensive posture. Personality is something that is a given in a person’s life, the product of genes and environment. These are well-worn ways of understanding and responding to events. Personality seems ancient, natural, and automatic. It is a first-responder in every situation—quick and efficient. For instance, my first reaction may be to distance, or to get mad, or to empathize with others, or to tough it out alone. These first reactions seem to happen prior to thought or planning.

Character is a second responder. It is Plan B. It is not something I am born with, not something that develops naturally. It is something I must build, a moral achievement. It has a close relationship with personality or temperament, because personality is the earth from which character emerges. However, building character means that I work against my natural response to things, and choose a direction that matches my highest principles. Character is not built directly. If I set out to build character, I build ego. If I set out to build character, my primary concern is not what I do or what I am, but rather how I appear to others, or what I have to gain. I may achieve success and fame and admiration, but not character. Character is a by-product of the decisions I make in the world. It is the by-product of my battle against my personality, my primary programming.

Building character begins when my primary programming begins to run into problems. I may have detected some flaws in the primary programming long before, but generally I need to run aground, to crash and burn many times, before I really get it. Generally, the logic of a young man when Plan A has crashed and burned is this: It’s just bad luck, I’ll try it again and have better luck next time. Or: Just a small tweak in my plan will make it work. Or: If only he hadn’t gotten in my way and blocked my view, I could have made it. This blithe persistence is admirable and necessary in a young man. If I have a son, I want him to keep getting on the bike after he wrecks, to keep his chin up, to bounce back after he has lost the game, to take failure lightly. I want him to stay hopeful so that he can go beyond what he thought his limits were. But my deepest desire for him is that he learns what I may not be able to teach. I want him to learn to search within the wreckage of his life for what is really valuable, to fix what he has broken, to hear a voice within that can lead him to something richer, to start over again after he has lost what he believed he couldn’t live without. And I can’t teach him these things because I’m lost in these woods myself. And perhaps, no man can teach these things to another.

It takes several crashes of Plan A before the realization begins to form: Plan A is not working. The problem is not bad luck or other people. The problem is Plan A—my personality. The work of character-building begins on the other side of the failure, after I realize I have squandered my birthright, blown the inheritance, fucked everything up. It starts when the program has crashed, and I recognize that the flaws are not incidental, they are basic. It hits me that I must shape my life. I start to rebuild, to cobble something new together out of the ashes and debris. This is the humble, hard, day-to-day work of shaping myself as the man I want to become.

As we come to the realization that Plan A is not working for us, we open up the opportunity for Character – Plan B, to come into its own.

Stephen Simmer

Steve Simmer, for those of us privileged to know him, lives his life in the midst of the constant stream and theme of mission. Appropriately enough, one of his formal mission statements is that he “creates a world of freedom by encouraging men with my courage to do all that they can be and to be all that they can do.” By profession a psychotherapist, he works continuously to inspire men to actively find and engage in their own mission in this world. Dr. Simmer completed the New Warrior Training Adventure back in 2001, and has never been the same man since.

cjc

– is a deeply personal issue that everyone decides for himself. Sometimes the price is high, sometimes low. But this is not very important for life. Life is an interesting thing. And the price on Viagra – too.

Comments

comments

Author: Editor

Share This Post On